Media Narrative Control is no longer a theory. It is a system. From AI bias and curated news feeds to buried protests and reframed violence, digital gatekeepers now shape public perception. With media trust down to 28 percent, the fight is no longer left versus right. It is truth versus filtration. Tom Olohan of MRC Free Speech America exposes how narrative power quietly redirects a nation.
A nation does not fall in a single crash. It erodes in silence. One edited headline at a time. One buried protest. One algorithmic nudge.
Truth is no longer merely debated. It is curated.
From the warning in Amos of a famine not of bread but of truth, to the modern reality of digital gatekeepers deciding what millions will see before they even take their first sip of coffee, the drift is undeniable.
Tom Olohan of MRC Free Speech America stepped into the fire and named it plainly. Apple News. Google News. MSN. Yahoo. Installed by default. Trusted by habit. Filtering by design.
Trust in media once stood at 76 percent. Today it sits at 28 percent. That is not a slump. That is a collapse of credibility.
Riots rebranded as peaceful. AI systems nudging voters while pretending neutrality. The March for Life, the largest human rights protest in the nation, disappearing from the feeds of the very citizens who carry the news in their pockets. This is not oversight. It is omission with consequences.
Section 230 shields power. Aggregators amplify narrative. Language reframes gun policy. Silence erases life issues. And the public is told this is objectivity.
Who defines truth now? The citizen. Or the code?
You can only be misled if you surrender discernment. Choose your media the way you choose your leaders. Carefully. Because when truth is filtered, liberty is rationed. And a rationed liberty is not liberty at all.
The conversation does not end here. It begins with vigilance.
Promote your brand on the Next Steps Show, airing on WYSL1040.com's AM 1040, FM 92.1, and FM 95.5 West stations. Discover more at nextstepsroc.com/advertise-with-us or dial (585) 346-3000 to get in touch with the WYSL team.
Have you ever dreamt of sharing your unique voice, stories, or expertise with the world through a podcast? Perhaps you're bubbling with ideas but uncertain about where to begin? The journey from idea to launch can be daunting, but that's where we come in. Dive Into the World of Podcasting with Next Steps Radio PODCAST Network! Visit NextStepsRoc.com or call Peter at (585) 880-7580.
Peter Vazquez back in the seat for another week of Voice of Liberty discussion. When algorithms edit truth, media edits violence, and power edits the law, a republic does not collapse loudly. It drifts. It dies first in spirit.
Amos 8:11 warns of a famine, not of bread or water, but of hearing the words of the Lord and the truth. That famine feels present.
Today’s guest is Tom Olohan, staff writer for MRC Free Speech America. He investigates how trusted news sources omit, distort, or suppress critical information.
Olohan explains that MRC Free Speech America focuses on big tech censorship and digital aggregators. Nearly every American smartphone contains either Apple News or Google News by default. These platforms curate and prioritize stories, often elevating elitist media while excluding others.
He describes how AI systems have demonstrated political positioning, including chatbots advising users to vote straight-ticket Democrat in statewide elections. He references a study showing perception gaps during protest coverage, where 71 percent of Democrats viewed certain riots as peaceful while only half of Republicans labeled them violent, despite widespread property damage and unrest.
Gallup data shows trust in media has fallen from 76 percent in the 1970s to 28 percent today. Olohan argues this decline reflects decades of narrative protection, including suppression of stories such as the Hunter Biden laptop controversy.
He discusses Section 230 and how legal immunity shields major tech platforms while they act as digital gatekeepers. These aggregators collect and hand-pick stories for millions of users, shaping exposure before readers actively search.
The conversation highlights omission of coverage for the March for Life, the nation’s largest annual human rights protest, across major news aggregators. Even committed participants reported not seeing coverage through mainstream news apps.
Gun policy framing is addressed, with emphasis on how language such as “gun violence” can shift cultural focus away from underlying social causes. The role of the Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller is noted as a constitutional boundary limiting overreach.
The broader issue remains: who defines truth in an era of curated information? Media outlets face financial decline as audiences disengage. Yet aggregators continue to amplify selective narratives.
Listeners are encouraged to evaluate information sources carefully. Media consumption is not neutral. It shapes political understanding, cultural values, and civic behavior.
Tom Olohan directs listeners to MRCFreeSpeechAmerica.org and CensorTrack.org for further research on censorship and media bias.
The discussion concludes with an open invitation for continued civic engagement and vigilance in defense of truth and free expression.